2016 new mazda cx 5 comparison test
2016 new mazda cx 5 comparison test - CX-5 is the car for the whole family, with light, airy interior that offers more head and legroom than many much larger vehicle. It is even more impressive when you lower the rear seats to create a huge load area.
It is also an economical vehicle in the 2.2-liter oil-burner guise - is worth ten pounds of fuel should buy you about a hundred miles from the monitoring and performance satisfied really strong through the rev range, so there is not much point opt for a more powerful 173 engine -bhp while the two-liter petrol version requires a lot of revs to perform as well as our choice.
Out on the road, road holding and handling proved to be excellent with a firm but compliant suspension settings.
This trip sublime subtle, and Cherokee handles better than you would expect, but I can not help but miss the boxy, utilitarian, truck-like character of the last model to wear the badge. Especially when it comes to transporting gear, like Jeep is painful at the top of the cargo space.
Factor in the big sticker price - which is $ 34,705 more expensive than the Cherokee Honda and Mazda and do not even include the menu - and it becomes difficult to recommend.
Overall, Cherokee is an interesting crossover - about as interesting as a crossover can be - but almost as practical as it is un-loved. It's hard to provide the highest value when the other two entrants in this comparison offers more for the money.
Mazda transformation began in 2012 with the introduction of the current generation of the Mazda CX-5 compact, five-passenger crossover SUV for the 2013 model year car Kodo design language that debuted on the CX-5, as well as a new family of engines SkyActiv built to provide increased gas mileage no loss of performance.
Now in its fourth year of production, the Mazda CX-5 received several improvements intended to improve the appearance, enhanced functionality, information technology, and polish his driving dynamics.
For this review, our experts evaluate the 2016 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring with front-wheel drive, Technology Grand Touring package, i-ActiveSense packages and cargo tray. the price came to $ 32,180, including a $ 880 destination charge.
2016 new mazda cx 5 comparison test
As has been true since its debut for the 2013 model year, Mazda CX-5 looks great. This is a beautifully balanced design, exuding character and good taste while showing restraint. Mazda should have been donated years ago 19-in. wheel design to the Touring trim level, even as an option, give buyers of mid-grade variant of the popular easy way to improve the look and attitude of the SUV.
exterior styling enhancements for 2016. The most noticeable at the level Grand Touring trim, which adds a new style of 19-in. aluminum wheels with central wheel finishing machine and dark gray painted. Updated grille design, and when Tek Grand Touring package is added, the next appearance is distinguished by adaptive LED lamps with signature LED running light new LED fog lights and LED taillights.
Identified as opportunities for improvement, seat Mazda CX-5 is getting improvements for 2016. Update seat structure is intended to provide greater fit and better comfort, and the rear seat cushion longer to improve support and provide more natural seating position.
Based on my evaluation, the CX-5 Grand Touring provides the perfect driving position, and the comfort level was very good. Strengthening chair still does not hold the driver in place as well as it should when whipping CX-5 into a hard turn to the left, and ventilated front seats are not available for the days of summer, but otherwise this SUV is well run. Just keep in mind that the front passenger seat adjuster that is offered only for the Touring and Grand Touring trim.
Despite improved for 2016, the rear seat cushions remain low CX-5 vehicles to ensure a flat load floor when the desired maximum cargo space. People with long legs do enjoy increased support for the thighs, although space remains comfortable shin.
2016 new mazda cx 5 comparison test
Mazda install the 155-horsepower, 2.0-liter 4-cylinder in the CX-5 Sport with front-wheel drive and six-speed manual gearbox. All other versions, including Sport with automatic transmission, 184-horsepower getting more powerful, 2.5-liter 4-cylinder.
For 2016, the automatic transmission get a sport driving mode, which is activated using a switch on the center console chrome that looks like a power window control from 1975 Cadillac. Without the sport mode is activated, the 6-speed automatic transmission is calibrated for quick upshift to save fuel, but quickly adapts to the driver with a heavy right foot to provide swift acceleration.
The interior is attractive, but there are a few nitpicks. The graphic meter can use modern color screen. Wiper-control stalk block engine start button when the wheel is fully adjustable forward. Faux stitching is carelessness as close to the driver's eyes on the LCD screen surround. The intuitive user interface allows the selection of the control buttons or the touch screen, although the radio preset buried too deep in the menu. And despite the well sculpted seats, a big driver might find them uncomfortable.
Vented front seats, heated rear seats and a panoramic glass roof is not available. Back seat does not slide forward and back to max out the cargo room, but friends and family will appreciate the leg and foot room. Cargo is about the same as the Subaru Forester and Nissan Rogue. Demanding maximum luggage space? Honda CR-V is freakishly big.
At around $ 22,700 for the base front-drive models with a manual transmission, handsome CX-5 has many like. Mazda sold about 284 000 vehicles in the United States last year. Instead, Ford sold 306,000 Escapes. Mazda is not the largest car company, but it makes the vehicle worthy of consideration for those who want a taste of Germany in their car without the price Germany.
Posting Komentar untuk "2016 new mazda cx 5 comparison test"